Former Community – We Moved

🆕 Coached community here, for posts & feedback public community here.

Please or Register to create posts and topics.

Being treated like admin is inherently disempowering

I've been volunteering for a non-profit as treasurer and board member for a few months now but I have felt something clashing between me and the director of the organization. Sometimes I feel it's ridiculous that I'm a board member,  volunteering my free time but treated like a gofer. This goes into the inherent hierarchy at the workplace (although this is not work, and I hate the pecking order that she establishes). I am feeling uncomfortable about a few of her behaviors:

  1. There is just a lot of menial tasks that are related to other aspects of operations (such as HR management, definitely not finances) and she assumes that I should take it on since that's what the previous treasurer was doing (which I think was just unhealthy)
  2. Asking questions that seem like doubting my work quality or simply distrustful - for example, asking about a single expense item - "Wow I didn't know that is this expensive, are you sure?" (I feel this is slightly questioning my ability to check records myself)
  3. Asking me to wait for her to check things before I assign categories of spending - which is a mind-boggling experience to me as I feel the categorization is pretty arbitrary (read: to her liking). I  feel it's a waste of time since my categorization needs to be corrected eventually every time, maybe I shouldn't even start that process, and she should be doing it
  4. Sending me multiple emails during the week which I have no capacity to answer and saying "I saw this, have you done it yet?"

I've tried to resolve this conflict before saying that I am a working professional and have no capacity to answer things during the week and she agreed that it's fine I work on my schedule (mostly weekends), but I feel she still sends messages during a week with a tone of urgency ("have you done this" type of thing). I do like this organization and its mission but I want to be treated with respect, I am not a worker and definitely not her subordinate. I also feel that her decision-making process is a bit authoritarian and not elaborated enough with the board. We will have a meeting soon and there would be a review session of her performance from other board members. I think I need to be assertive and clear about how I feel. Here is what I am gonna do:

  1. Laying out exactly I will do and think is within the scope of treasurer responsibilities, and push other operational tasks to her and other people in operations (I'll also try to be a bit sneaky to distant myself from the tasks that she would be checking personally regularly)
  2. Starting to ask questions about her decision-making more explicitly in the board meeting and ask all members from the board to chime in (this could be a bit confrontational but I want this to be transparent, as she doesn't ask anybody herself)
  3. During the reviewing session assert exactly how I feel in this process - what behaviors are respecting my boundaries and what are not, and inform the board that I will step down if this continues to happen (this is also a bit severe, but some of the urgent messages from her are really affecting me)

To be frank I feel she's a bit narcissistic, and this could be a break point for me to volunteer for this org for long, but I am willing to see what can be done and if I will have support from the board. What do you guys think? Are the above steps good to address the current situation? I appreciate your honest opinions.

Matthew Whitewood has reacted to this post.
Matthew Whitewood

My first gut reaction when reading this:

How about telling that to her?
But then it sounds like you did it already -partially, at least, so I'd look into that as well: can you speak up more direct and straight (while also being respectful)?-

It's difficult to suggest much more without being more, but just two things I feel like adding:

  1. Make sure you talk to her first, and all your points are clear to her before you bring them to the board, or it may feel like you're not talking straight to her, and not assertive/communicative enoguh
  2. Say that if things don't change you're forced to leave, not that you will leave. Big difference, one is a threat frame, the other is a "we'll lose a good resource" frame

P.S.
OFF-TOPIC

There was a thread you opened some time ago in the social life.
I opened it wanting it to reply, but I find it difficult to go through the full text because I felt it had a "wall of text" effect on me.
Feedback for you on potentially structuring your posts in a way that makes it easier to read them.

OFF-TOPIC

Matthew Whitewood, Kavalier and 2 other users have reacted to this post.
Matthew WhitewoodKavalierBEmily
Community, new content and Confidence University now available here.

Sounds like a complex situation where I don't know the full details.

Adding on to Lucio's points

  • How strong are your relationships with the other board members?
  • How strong are the director's relationships with the other board members?

Having conversations with the others could give you more information/intelligence.
You could also get buy-in before the board meetings.

Depending on your goals and time commitment, you could evaluate risks/rewards for each strategy.

OFF-TOPIC

There was a thread you opened some time ago in the social life.
I opened it wanting it to reply, but I find it difficult to go through the full text because I felt it had a "wall of text" effect on me.
Feedback for you on potentially structuring your posts in a way that makes it easier to read them.

OFF-TOPIC

OFF-TOPIC

I also wanted to reply but wasn't sure how to reply too.
Your social situations come across as complex.

OFF-TOPIC

Lucio Buffalmano and Emily have reacted to this post.
Lucio BuffalmanoEmily

Appreciate the feedback, Lucio and Matthew!

Yes, I agree that this is a bit complex involving dynamics of the board and her. I have spoken to the board president and I think she is going to communicate with her about my concerns. I also proposed a document of separation of some tasks that should not be within my role and can use that as a starting point. I feel good about where this is going, also I got some context from the board president that the scenario of the org has been changing during the past couple years and a lot of things are not well-defined, so we agreed that it is a good time to review the operational processes.

Also, will address the problem with the other thread in that thread, thanks for letting me know.

 

Lucio Buffalmano has reacted to this post.
Lucio Buffalmano
Processing...
Scroll to Top