Former Community – We Moved

🆕 Coached community here, for posts & feedback public community here.

ForumResources: Researches, Studies, TheoriesFeedback / IdeasTypos, Grammar, Syntax, & Content …

Please or Register to create posts and topics.

Typos, Grammar, Syntax, & Content Improvement - Megathread

#61 · August 27, 2020, 11:25 am

https://thepowermoves.com/women-who-love-psychopaths/

Psychopaths like women with high morals because she is unlikely to do to him what she’s done to her.

you mean HE has done... to her

"Operant conditioning: the psychopaths Dr Jekill / Mr Hyde double personality rewards positive behavior and punishes bad one, molding her personality to fit what he wants"

to make it more clear I would add:rewards positive behavior and punishes bad one (classified in accordance to his selfish convenience and distorted take on what other actions should be) OR " rewards preffered behavior and punished disliked one."

"while another defecated on her because he came too soon (!!!)."

Damm I would have hoped that was a typo, that's an extremely nasty "power move" to shit on someone like that and for that "reason", lol

Lucio Buffalmano has reacted to this post.

#62 · August 27, 2020, 11:27 am

Module 6, chapter 3:

Most of them still don’t wanna fight and would rather just look “badass” without

The end of the sentence is missing: "without fighting?"

Lucio Buffalmano and Stef have reacted to this post.

#63 · August 28, 2020, 5:39 am

Thank you guys, fixed!

Quote from Stef on August 27, 2020, 11:25 am
"while another defecated on her because he came too soon (!!!)."
Damm I would have hoped that was a typo, that's an extremely nasty "power move" to shit on someone like that and for that "reason", lol

Crazy shit, eh -literally, in this case :S-?

That's another "you're my bitch power move", showing power through humiliation is a de-humanizing form of domination.
I'd like to see what kind of women would accept that type of behavior.

Stef has reacted to this post.

Community, new content and Confidence University now available here.

#64 · August 28, 2020, 5:52 am

Dark Psychology: 7 Ways to Manipulate People

Women gain when men who their lives doting on them, men lose

something seems to be missing.

Lucio Buffalmano has reacted to this post.

#65 · August 28, 2020, 6:27 am

Thank you, Stef.

The correct wording was:

Women gain when men in their lives dote on them, men lose

Stef has reacted to this post.

Community, new content and Confidence University now available here.

#66 · August 28, 2020, 12:34 pm

To Be Good, You First Need to Be Bad: Here’s Why

Why You Must Muster Evil

By mastering evil I am referring to:

not sure if you wanted to use the word muster or master in the title, as in the next paragraph you talk about mastering.
I don't dominate too well all the possible uses of the word muster

Lucio Buffalmano has reacted to this post.

#67 · August 28, 2020, 5:08 pm

In 8. Submissive Words: How Submission Sounds / 3.3. “They said…”

“they said I could it” => “they said I could do it”

Lucio Buffalmano has reacted to this post.

#68 · August 28, 2020, 5:14 pm

Thank you so much, guys, fixed it!

Stef has reacted to this post.

Community, new content and Confidence University now available here.

#69 · August 28, 2020, 11:00 pm

9. Practical Steps to Increase Your Confidence & Social Power /4.1. Stand Up For What You Stand For

"Please not his mistake at minute 8:51." => make his mistake

#70 · August 30, 2020, 6:43 am

Quote from Stef on August 30, 2020, 6:43 am
https://thepowermoves.com/the-fundamental-strategies-of-power/
Reframing the interaction as win-win reminds people that you are still in a territory that adds value to both you
to both OF you
Look at how Jimmy from “The Goodfellas”, based on a true story, deals with the “enemies”:
The video was removed from youtube.
It doesn’t matter how powerful a country is: if it starts wars, it loses power.
I think that sentence, more so if taken out of context, came as too much of a generalization, for sure there are always costs and even hidden cost plus opportunity cost in any war, nice people usually would be against aggresive war (not in self defense or pressed by extreme neccesiy) for all its horrors, and something small may become big by future developments, but I supposed in the long run, some wars, for some aggresive countries have yield some net benefits, at least in amoral terms of power?, what do you think?
Wars are often bad news even when you win.
Take Sparta for example, which theoretically won against Athens.
Sparta’s victory over Athens was a loss for everyone. It ended the Greek golden age, which never recovered.
And when the bigger guys invaded Greece, Sparta had nobody to ally with.
the classic example for that would be:
A Pyrrhic victory is a victory that inflicts such a devastating toll on the victor that it is tantamount to defeat. Winning a Pyrrhic victory takes a heavy toll that negates any true sense of achievement or damages long-term progress.
The phrase originates from a quote from Pyrrhus of Epirus, whose triumph against the Romans in the Battle of Asculum in 279 BC destroyed much of his forces and – while a tactical victory – forced the end of his campaign.
This is a shortened version of a Power University lesson, which contains 2 more fundamental strategies.
Awesome Article Lucio, concise and so packaged with wisdom, insight and actionable life-changing advice, I am really looking toward December to read the full stuff, maybe with some new golden content as you told me you are remodeling/polishing The Power University.

The 4 Fundamental Strategies of Power

Reframing the interaction as win-win reminds people that you are still in a territory that adds value to both you

to both OF you

Look at how Jimmy from “The Goodfellas”, based on a true story, deals with the “enemies”:

The video was removed from youtube.

It doesn’t matter how powerful a country is: if it starts wars, it loses power.

I think that sentence, more so if taken out of context, came as too much of a generalization, for sure there are always costs and even hidden cost plus opportunity cost in any war, nice people usually would be against aggresive war (not in self defense or pressed by extreme neccesiy) for all its horrors, and something small may become big by future developments, but I supposed in the long run, some wars, for some aggresive countries have yield some net benefits, at least in amoral terms of power?, what do you think?

Wars are often bad news even when you win.
Take Sparta for example, which theoretically won against Athens.
Sparta’s victory over Athens was a loss for everyone. It ended the Greek golden age, which never recovered.
And when the bigger guys invaded Greece, Sparta had nobody to ally with.

the classic example for that would be:

A Pyrrhic victory is a victory that inflicts such a devastating toll on the victor that it is tantamount to defeat. Winning a Pyrrhic victory takes a heavy toll that negates any true sense of achievement or damages long-term progress.

The phrase originates from a quote from Pyrrhus of Epirus, whose triumph against the Romans in the Battle of Asculum in 279 BC destroyed much of his forces and – while a tactical victory – forced the end of his campaign.

This is a shortened version of a Power University lesson, which contains 2 more fundamental strategies.

Awesome Article Lucio, concise and so packaged with wisdom, insight and actionable life-changing advice, I am really looking toward December to read the full stuff, maybe with some new golden content as you told me you are remodeling/polishing The Power University.