Fooled by Randomness (2001) is a book on the fallibility of human cognition, exploring our tendency to develop logically-sounding but actually naive and false stories and trends where there was actually only just chance and randomness.
- There’s often more chance involved in big successes than people think
- We see links, trends and causality where it’s often just randomness
- Looking at what successful people do can be misleading to achieve success
About The Author: Nassim Nicholas Taleb is a former trader, philosopher, statician and risk analyst.
He is also one of my favorite authors, penning masterpieces such as “The Black Swan“, “Antifragile” and “Skin in The Game“.
Taleb first addresses some criticism.
He says his skepticism is not nihilism: of course chance favors the prepared, the gritty and the perseverant.
Skills count, he says, but skills count much less in highly random environments (such as trading and investment).
Nassim Taleb says he spent his life in a fierce fight between his brain -not fooled by randomness- and his emotions -completely fooled by randomness-.
And the success he’s had is because of going around his emotions instead of rationalizing them.
Part I: Solons Warning
Part of I of Fooled by Randomness discusses the role that that luck plays in life.
Chapter 1: If You’re So Rich, Why Aren’t You So Smart?
Nassim Taleb says that it’s silly to judge people’s skills and talent purely on the basis of their success or wealth.
Because there’s a good chance it’s just chance -or risky behavior that’s not likely to last in the long term-.
Taleb lays out the example of “master of the universe” successful traders who made millions only to later lose many more millions in the subsequent market crash.
Those master of the universe traders didn’t make money because they were good, they were just piling up on risk and riding the wave.
But lucky fools never realize they are lucky fools, and prefer fooling themselves into the idea they’re skilled.
So when the wave turned, they drowned in it.
Nassim Taleb uses Nero Tulip, a friend of his, an example of a more rational investor (I looked him up BTW, some says it’s Taleb himself).
Nero Tulip always invested safely and ended his career early and wealthy. Not super wealthy, though, because super wealthy entails big risks and it’s a huge game of chance.
Risk-conscious hard work and discipline lead with high reliability to a comfortable life, he says. Beyond that, it’s high randomness.
Basically: mild success is skills while wild success is variance and randomness.
Chapter 2: A Bizarre Accounting Method
When assessing a successful individual one should also consider the possibilities of failure that he faced.
He uses Russian Roulette as an extreme example.
If you were to bet 10 million on Russian Roulette, in 5 of the 6 alternatives outcomes, you’d be a millionaire.
Now, the Russian Roulette is an extreme example, but in many endeavours, people carry on without realizing that much of their success is highly dependant on chance.
And the more they win, the more they feel safer because they attribute success to skills.
Finance and trading, Nassim Taleb implies, is such a field with high randomness.
Other more stable professions -dentistry, he mentions-, rely less on randomness and more on skills and hard work.
Abstraction Fallacy: Picking The Wrong Death Insurance
If you ask people if they’d like to insure against death or against death by a terrorist attack before a flight, they’d be much more likely to take the latter.
Which makes no sense, because “death” includes a terrorist attack. It turns out, what grabs people’s attention is always something vivid.
Risk is Irrational Because It’s Emotional
Taleb says that we don’t deal with risk detection and risk avoidance rationally because our emotional part of the brain deals with risk.
Our rational risk thinking has little to do with actual risk avoidance.
What it does instead is to rationalize our actions by assigning some logic to them after we’ve already taken a decision.
Chapter 3: A Mathematical Meditation on History
Nassim Taleb introduces the Montecarlo Simulators.
Montecarlo simulators are computer algorithms that produce a (high) number of results for a given choice.
He says the results of a Montecarlo Simulator are a much better test against randomness than looking at the past.
Simply looking at the past indeed present survivorship bias.
Importantly, Nassim Taleb says here that you don’t look at mistakes after the fact. You only look at decisions in light of the information you had up until that point.
That’s why I write you should base your self-esteem not based on results but on processes.
And that’s what Ray Dalio refers to when he says you should “look at the swing more than at the hit”.
Chapter 4: Randomness, and the Scientific Intellectual
Taleb brandishes some poetry to make the case that we don’t need to apply scientific rigor in all things of life.
We don’t really need to be realistic an rational when it comes to religion, feelings and arts, for example, which is a mistake that many do (see: The God Delusion).
We need to be more rational when it comes to fields where rationality is more important though, which something that few really do systematically.
On his first salvo against evolutionary psychology Taleb says that The Selfish Gene sounds mathematical with its many equations, but it’s actually just artistic prose :).
Chapter 5: Survival of the Least Fit
Nassim Taleb says some believe that plant and animals reproduce on a highway to perfection.
And the same thought has been applied to the economy as a whole, with the best companies surviving.
He says instead that there’s a lot of randomness in evolution. And sometimes it goes off tangents on dead end branches. And some other times it can even regress.
Negative mutations for example survive, not longer than for a few generations, in spite of being worse.
Taleb says that on average animals will be fit, but not all of them, and not at every single time.
Basically, he says, we don’t live in a world where things move continuously towards improvement.
Chapter 6: Skewness and Asymmetry
Taleb talks about median estimates and how they often lead us astray.
For example, if a patient with a certain illness lives on average for 8 months tells us little.
Because there might be a big divide between those that live past a certain month mark VS those who die very quickly.
Asymmetry is countered with expected value.
You should multiply the expected value of an event by its likelihood and then add up the total of the expected value results.
Chapter 7: The Problem of Induction
Induction means that you can never be sure about your final results, no matter how many observations you make.
For example, no matter if you see ten white swans or a thousand white swans, you cannot mathematically rule out the existence of a black swan.
By seeing a single black instead, you can be certain black swans exist.
Similarly, he says George Soros makes several induction mistakes in his book.
Soros infers that his trading system worked because his portfolio was up.
But that his portfolio is up, says Taleb, is no proof of anything.
Part II: Monkeys on Typewriters
Taleb introduces the survivorship bias, a bias which he says is chronic in our society.
The survivorship bias is the failure to account for those who didn’t survive (maybe while doing the exact same thing the successful ones did).
Ironically, the most successful survivor is also the most visible one, skewing our survivorship bias even further.
And that’s why, as mentioned earlier, it’s important to always adjust success and results to the odds of failure.
Chapter 8: Too Many Millionaires Next Door
This chapter starts lighter, with Taleb making fun of The Millionaire Next Door,
The Millionaire Next Door peddles the idea one should save hard to become a millionaire, but Taleb says he doesn’t see the point in getting rich if you will live like a monk (same concept MJ De Marco promotes).
Then we go back to risk, chances and randomness.
Taleb lashes out on the even more foolish The Millionaire Mind which says that “a taste for risk” is what makes millionaires.
Taleb says that “a taste for risk-taking” is necessary for large successes, but also a necessary trait for… Large failures.
An analysis of bankruptcies would also find a predilection for risk-taking, says Taleb.
Chapter 9: It’s Easier To Fry an Egg Than to Buy and Sell
Taleb explains the property of volatility and randomness.
He says that successful performers will emerge even among a group of very poor performers -provided that there’s enough of them-.
This is simply the effect of volatility and random distributions, but an external observer will easily misconstrue the results for skills.
Consequently, Taleb says, success presents a higher correlation with the number of players than with their skills.
He doesn’t say Warren Buffet is not skilled, but that a large population of investors will necessarily produce someone with Buffet’s results… Just by luck (!).
Regression to the mean: there is no hot hand
Nassim Taleb introduces the regression to the mean phenomenon introducing the hot hand fallacy.
The hot hand fallacy is the belief that people who have been successful in the past are more likely to be successful in the future.
It’s simply a question of large numbers, he says: with many players, it’s almost guaranteed that someone will embark on a long streak of good shots. But the tendency is to eventually regress to their long term mean.
He says not all deviations are a question of chance, but a disproportionate amount are.
Markets Don’t Always Go Up
He says that a common misconception is that stock markets, over a long period of time, will always provide great returns.
But if rational investors had bought stocks in 1900 in Argentina, Russia, USA, and UK, he would have lost it all in Russia.
Chapter 10: Losers Take All – The Nonlinearities of Life
Nonlinear mean that a small change will cause a disproportionate effect on the results.
The idiom “the straw that broke the camel’s back” is an example of a nonlinear result, and that happens in many realms of life.
Sometimes one new customer, one order or that last push you make can bring a windfall.
But he says that viral effects are too difficult to predict to take those studies seriously.
My Note: I couldn’t agree more.
He says that it’s the beginning of a path that often makes a big difference.
Our path is not independent from previous steps, and early success often begets future success (for a number of different reasons).
So a random lucky chance in the beginning will sometimes take people on a very successful path.
And external observers will misinterpret the path as wholly due to skills.
Chapter 11: Randomness and Our Mind: We Are Probably Blind
Taleb says we are blind to probability.
We tend to see facts and chances as either black or white, good or bad, happening or not happening.
He mentions Thinking Fast and Slow and discusses a few more biases. I invite you to check Thinking Fast and Slow because it’s more in depth.
We See Causality Where There Is Only Randomness
Taleb says people tend to see causality where there’s only randomness.
For example, when a currency is down commentators give a reason on why that happened.
But, he says, it’s very difficult to isolate single causes and that might not even make sense.
Because it’s often just noise.
Small moves are noise, larger ones tend to be more significant, he says, in a nonlinear fashion.
Part III: Wax in my Ears
Chapter 12: Gambler’s Ticks and Pigeons in a Box
Taleb says many people often pick up habits and ticks based on what they did when they have previously been successful.
He does it too, and so do many animals by the way.
It’s not always easy overcoming our own ticks, so we should work around them.
For example, avoid distraction and noise if you know you tend to overreact to them.
Chapter 13: Probability and Skepticism
Taleb says that science is great, but scientists are not.
Becaues scientists tend to “marry their own positions”.
And he is right, if you see how some scientists answered to the replication crisis like rabid dogs whose bone has been taken away.
He says most scientists cling their positions and make excuses instead of doing the courageous thing: looking for the truth and taking ownership.
That’s why, he says, science often moves forward funeral after funeral.
Once the old guard dies, the new guys are more ready to accept and challenge old beliefs.
Chapter 14: Bacchus Abandons Anthony
The link between the skills of a CEO and the results of the company are very weak (similar concept from Sinek’s Leaders Eat Last).
And he delves into satisfiers and optimizers.
Optimizers spend their lives looking for what to improve and they change residence to save a couple of points of income tax.
What’s the point, he quips, “I thought wealth was supposed to buy peace of mind”.
I was surprised Taleb didn’t quote it, but this is very similar to satisfiers and maximizers in The Paradox of Choice, another great book.
Real Life Applications
Success does not equal skills
Don’t think people are necessarily amazing because of some success they obtained. They might have achieved success because of pure randomness.
Failure does not equal bad decisions
You should only judge your decisions based on the information you had when you took them, and not on the results.
Always consider the alternatives
Similar to the above, don’t think that becuase you won -or lost- you did well -or badly-. Consider the odds with which you played.
Inductive Reasoning is not absolute
Just because you saw someone succeed a number of times it doesn’t mean it will always succeed.
Markets don’t always go up
Similar to the above, don’t buy into the narrative that if you invest today you will certainly be rich tomorrow. I would personally recommend you invest on yourself more than on the markets.
Ignore the noise, focus on the signal
Many things in your life -like the news for example- are just noise. Focus on what really matters to you instead and on your goals
- No Structure
I wish Nassim Taleb had been more structured with his thoughts and core messages. He goes a bit off tangents sometimes making the book more like a personal diary than a well-designed product to support his core messages.
It’s a pity because those core messages are really important and insightful.
Fooled by Randomess can be a complex book to digest.
But it didn’t necessarily had to be so: simplifying is a choice (and a skill).
Taleb’s own dissertations and, ironically, his huge culture, get in the way of a simple message.
Literary and historical references that people will most likely miss out are also likely to arise more confusions.
This doesn’t have to be a negative though, I for one love those bigger picture (or fun) references and tangents.
I love Taleb’s irreverent and biting style.
He is not afraid of telling it how it is even when he touches big names (Bill Gates, Soros and Warren Buffet just to name a few).
It’s not just great prose though, “Fooled by Randomness” provides readers with important tools and concepts to understand the world.
I used to reflect on the underestimated role of randomness for example and I’m glad for Taleb’s work which I can now refer to.
Finally, I really enjoyed Taleb also says randomness cannot affect your behavior.
That’s you and under your full control.
Don’t get fooled by randomness: Get the book on Amazon